Home

SNI digital innovations in learning, in association with the medical news network, and silent majority speaks, are pleased to present an investigative report on what doctors need to know about

COVID-19

This is an interview with Russell Blalock, conducted on January 30th, 2024. COVID-19 and its vaccine have produced a widespread disease which is the most severe in the last hundred years. It has

killed millions of people, injured millions more, and its future complications are unknown, but they are unfolding.

Thousands of papers have been written, information has been suppressed. Governments have dictated treatments, health care regulations have been proposed. Most physicians in the world are not

acquainted with or do not know the basic biology of the virus, the vaccine or its complications. Patients worldwide are confused by the changing information from the government, media and other

sources

This is the first of SI Digital's investigative reports. These reports are done to provide doctors and the public with the known facts about this disease and its effects and other subjects of great

concern to physicians.

This program is in two one hour segments The material discussed is extensive and thoroughly researched. Every statement can be supported by factual information as referenced. SI Digital's policy is

to address issues of concern to physicians all over the world. We present the facts, and you decide what you will do. Our major concern is that the patient should come first.

We hope you enjoy these investigative reports Thank you very much for watching. The interviewee in this series will be Russell Al-Blalock. He's the CEO of Theoretical Neuroscience Research, the

Associate Editor-in-Chief of the Neuroinflammation section of Surgical Neurology International, an Internet Journal which is read and seen in 239 countries all over the world

the creator or editor of the Blalap Wellness Report, which is published monthly, and the author of multiple books and scientific papers.

Some of the books which Dr. Blalock has written are natural solutions for liver cure, natural strategies for cancer patients, his prescription for natural health, a book on excitotoxins, a

subject which he discusses in more detail in this interview. Along with Dr. Oussman, they co-authored a publication entitled The China Virus, What is the Truth? All of these books are available

on amazoncom. The book The China Virus, What is the Truth, is available free as an e-book, as an iglobal Go to menu, and from menu go to e-books, and you will see the book Dr. Blaylock has also

written a series of articles. a number of which address COVID.

These articles have been published in Surgical Neurology International, and he's also written articles on immuno-excitotoxicity, a concept which he has worked on for the past 10 years, which he

thinks is fundamental to the neurodegenerative diseases involving the immune system activation.

He's also written a book, this paper on the biochemical basis of neurodegenerative disease, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's, and the role of immuno-excitotoxicity in those diseases. And published

articles on Parkinson's disease specifically. His Blalock Wellness Report is published monthly. The website is indicated on the bottom. Hello everyone, I'm James Hausband. I'm here with Russell

Blalock, who's a,

a physician who's gonna be our expert today, talking about the topic of what doctors need to know about COVID-19.

And as a way of introduction, I'm gonna talk to you a little bit about some things that have gone on just from mind you or what the past history is. Back at about the end of 2019, 2020, we became

aware that there was an infection in China.

It was eventually labeled COVID-19 or sometimes called the China virus. It began to spread worldwide. Went to Europe and traveled all over the world. It was then called a pandemic. And after that,

a whole series of events occurred because people were fearful that this was gonna cause death They were told that it was a very threatening disease.

the serious problems that were being reported in China. And there got to be, I think somewhat near panic about this. People were told to wear masks to isolate it. They were told not to go to work.

And people were hospitalized. We heard reports of people dying in the hospital. And so there was a very, the atmosphere was very frightening. The government went into a full-court press and tried

to develop a vaccine very rapidly with the pharmaceutical companies. And eventually toward the end of

2020, some vaccines began to emerge. And there were some other alternatives, but we were told they were not very valuable. And then a massive attempt was, effort was made to vaccinate the

population. And there was not only one set of vaccination, vaccinations, years there were two, there were multiple sets of vaccinations. People experienced loved ones who were dying or people

knew about that. They seemed to be getting the same experience from around the world.

And

as time went on, this is what happened eventually. The virus seemed to peter out or the disease seemed to peter out And some of the restrictions were reduced or eliminated,

but they're then cropped up as a series of questions and evidence saying, well, maybe this isn't all as bad as it seems to be. And there was different types of reporting about it, some reported

very serious problems of others reported it, it's not that serious. And so we get to the question of what is the truth? Which is fundamentally what we're trying to do

in surgical neurology, international surgical neurology, SNI digital, that's what this is being recorded on.

So we decided that it would be worthwhile to have an interview with somebody who was very knowledgeable about this, happens to be a neurosurgeon who was very interested in many of these disease

processes and way ahead of his time in many predictions. So we can ask him, and he's written many papers on this, books on this about COVID-19 and its complications as his own publication,

Healthcare Publication. And that's Russell Blalock. Russell, do you want to tell anybody, tell people about your background a

little bit, or do I cover it? Well, you covered it pretty well. I graduated from LSU Medical School in the '70s. And I, from there, I did a straight surgery, End turn, ships. And after that,

I did a neurosurgery residency in South Carolina, and I practiced neurosurgery. I've always been interested in neurosurgery. And also everything connected with it. Dr. Janato was a person I knew

very well, and I used to scrub with him. And he said, A neurosurgery should know everythingabout medicine. And I took that to heart I learned general medicine. I learned how to treat diabetes. I

learned how to get steroids, do other surgical procedures. So you and I pretty much agree on

that. And that has been what I've been interested in. So I don't limit myself just a neurosurgery, which is very interesting, but brain function, spinal cord function, virology, bacteriology

All of these disciplines. that in some way might impact the health.

Well, okay, and it turns out that COVID-19 does involve a central nervous system. You're gonna tell us about that. And obviously other systems that are impacted on the health and things that

you've written about over the years. So why don't we get started? Because I think the audience wants to know, I think what we'd like to do is take everybody through it from starting about questions

about what is that actually? What is the virus? How bad is it? They heard questions about that it was made in the laboratory. How did it get out? How did it spread around the world? What do

people know about it? What's its genetic sequence? What did the government get involved in all this? Is the virus really as bad as what it is? And do we need all the protective measures we had?

And then after that, the vaccine. What do we know about the vaccine? like all the other vaccines were told to take or is it more dangerous? You've written a lot about vaccines over the years. It

was made in record time, so the public could be safe from this.

We need to know what are the doctors that are listening to this or even some of the lay public, what else is in this vaccine? Need to know about that. And what do we know about it? Where does it

go in the body? We were told it was localized initially, but you've written about this. I've just written about it. It's distributed all throughout the body. And what about these other drugs we

were told about that you, Ivermectin and I drugs the chloroquine, you can't use them. They're not very good and they're toxic and so forth. Was that true? And then how bad is the disease? How

was it to cause a lot of deaths? Everybody was tested. They know he had to go in the car or go to the hospital, keep getting the PCR testing Was the testing worthwhile? What part did the hospital

play in this? What were the respirators? And we read some things that hospitals were being paid, extra amount of money for taking care of these people. The medical journals, did they report about

it? And if not, what happened? We know there's some evidence that saying all this information was suppressed. And now we're two years, three years down the line, and we're seeing complications

that are occurring. What are these complications? How bad are they and what does it mean to all of us? So we're going to try to do this. And you and I've talked about this in about the next hour

or so to give the doctors who really didn't get a lot of information about it, what is the truth about COVID-19? What do I really need to know? Is the information I have on a date? Or was it

correct to begin with? And let's start with the virus.

What is this a bad virus to begin with? It's supposed to be a virus like the cold virus. It's a coronavirus. Can you tell us what we need to know about it? And we'll go from there.

Well, from the very beginning, it was shrouded in secrecy.

And initially, when the virus came out, I was watching what was happening in China, and people were just falling down and they'd be walking along perfectly healthy and fall down And then we found

out that was actually fake photos. And then the Chinese government had faked them. And the physician who first discovered the coronavirus in China and its effect on people, he reported it. And the

Chinese government let him know very soon, we don't want this reported, do you keep quiet? Well, he had already published it and he quickly came down with COVID.

and in a short time he was dead. He was a fairly young physician.

Then they sequestered all the information about the virus. We had all kinds of information from the Wuhan Bioweapons Lab, which was a bioweapons lab, run by the Chinese Communist military. They

took all the information about the virus and hid it and destroyed

it And it had been published years before, but it was too late, that was in the Western literature. Very quickly, the virus begins to spread to other countries. And no one knew anything about

this virus, except it was a coronavirus. And as you said, there's a group of coronaviruses and most are, you know, pretty benign. The coal virus about maybe as high as 4, 5, 10, or

coronaviruses

every year have been for decades. People will get a little sick a few days or while. And so President Trump made the comment, when this all started out and started to spread, he said, This is not

a thing to worry about, it's no worse than the flu. The mortality is not worse than the flu. Well, there were several epidemiologists who were looking at this. There was a virologist in foreign

countries who were looking at this They eventually said, everything Trump said was true, that the mortality was very low. Now, there are coronaviruses

that produce the death, but they also affect the very same group of people, the same age group, same frailty, same disease states, and they found out that young people didn't get it are they were

not affected by it. and that they recovered very quickly and they didn't transmit it and this virus died out. Well, most people know this in virology is that if a virus is a very fatal virus,

generally it dies out. The viruses that can spread, spread particularly worldwide are those that are more benign

because it doesn't kill the host.

And some of the early people said, Well, we don't know anything about this virus, won't we type it? Find out what the amino acid sequences are. Well, the government did everything in its power

to keep that from being done. But a few people did that and they said, What we found in this virus, it's been artificially created. Well, it was created in the

Wuhan Bioweapons lab of the Chinese Communist Party. It was not an independent lab. It was not a free lab. It was a bioweapons lab. Then it gradually came out. We are learning more and more about

the sequence. And one of the high ranking immunologists at National Institutes of Health, Kirsten Anderson immediately put out an email, I've looked at this virus, I typed it, and it looks like

it was artificially created.

Immediately, he was attacked by Fauci and some of the people in the NIH, and the next day changed the story, that this was a completely natural virus, and it jumped from an animal, a bat, and

later a pangolin, to a human

So people were curious, why did you change your story? You immediately, your first response was, There's no question. This was created. This is not a natural virus, and it did not come from an

album. Well, as we all remember, in the very beginning, everything was about a wet market in China, and they were selling bats, particularly a lot of bats, and that this is where the

coronavirus began, and then it spread through China, and then it spread through the rest of the world. The problem was, is they finally tracked down patient zero, which is where it all started.

He never visited a wet market. The wet market said, We didn't sell any bats.

Unfortunately, the Chinese government didn't allow time to cover that up, and it got out, and so two things were evident one of the first patients that was reported to have. uh, the COVID

infection in China had never been to the wet market. Number two, the wet market didn't sell baths. So that story for a while kind of fell through and recently they've tried to resurrect it. Then

they changed it. Oh, it came from this animal of penguin. Uh, and uh, that's, that's kind of falling through as well. So eventually we realize, uh, this, this story is not, not consistent.

There's something wrong with it. The thing that was wrong with it, uh, basically all you had to do is see what the Chinese Communist government did. They locked down, uh, uh, the city of Wuhan.

They wouldn't let anybody out, anybody in, they were trying to make the impression that they were going to keep it local, but they did stop international flights. So you could take international

flights out of this infected, uh, area of China.

as long as you wouldn't spread it to the rest of China.

And so very quickly we started to see it. Well, one of the places it went to was Italy. And I just happened to read a report by an Italian reporter who they said was probably one of the best

reporters they had. And he examined it and he said, You know, the death from flu is the highest in northern Italy. Because the local press made a big deal about COVID is killing more people in

northern Italy than anywhere in the world. It's changed and there's something about it. And he said, There's nonsense. It's the most polluted place in Europe. It always exceeds the rest of Europe

and flu deaths. And that this is no different Well, finally, they did autopsies on these people in northern Italy, and they found out.

Well, these all were elderly. Almost all of them were either in the '80s or '90s. And they found that all types of years, they died of their comorbid disease. They didn't die of the COVID. And

that on average, they had three to four comorbid diseases. That was found here as well, and other countries, Germany, Belgium, the different places, they started looking and said, well,

almost all these people near

the end of their life, they have three or four comorbid diseases. They're very sick. They're very frail. They're not healthy elderly. And in Italy, they had, I think, two cases of people that

were 101 years old. They got COVID and they recovered just fine. They didn't have any problem.

So people began to smell a rat, but they still didn't want this sequence They didn't want to know what the virus was. did.

And what it was consistent was, was this a natural virus or was this created in a laboratory? Well, finally, somebody did the sequencing and they found out there's no question that this was

artificially created. And recently, it's come out, well, they found a smoking gun and no nucleation, which is used to slice these RNA molecules and make insertions. And it said it's obvious that

other viral sequences have been inserted in this virus. One of these is HIV. And recently, they did a study and found out 24 of the people that had the spike protein injected in them through the

vaccine, came out HIV

post. And so they said, well, maybe they had HIV. So they tested HIV, and they didn't find any.

So it was confirmed that actually it was inserted in this virus sequence. So now we have absolute proof beyond any doubt that it was artificially created in this bio-weapons lab. Now, the really

scary thing was that they couldn't do it by themselves They tried to infect animals, particular pulmonary tissues with the COVID virus they had created. They couldn't infect them. And so Ralph

Berwick, who is a immunologist at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, he created a type of mouse that had human

lung tissue. And then he found that you could infect that lung tissue with this virus. And so you share that with us.

the Chinese Communist by a weapons lab. And they were able to make, design this virus that would attach to the H2 receptor, enter the cell and produce the infection. But even so, when we looked

at all the data, and we looked at the graphs of people who were not sick, not frail, didn't have comorbid diseases, their death rate was no different than a mild flute, at best a moderate flute.

And they declared it a pandemic. Well, then it started looking at the, you know, the World Health Organization declared it a world pandemic. Well, there's certain criteria that you have to meet

to be a flat pandemic. And when they looked at the criteria, they said, well, number one, it not only has to spread around the world, 'Cause coal-fired spreads around the world every year.

It has to kill people, have to be dangerous. They have to get serious, serious. Then it's a pandemic. And if it doesn't spread all over the world, and it does not produce serious pathological

change, even though it's a virus that goes everywhere, it's not a pandemic. Well, this virus did not meet the criteria of a pandemic Yet the World Health Organization and our American government

declared it a pandemic.

Let me stop you there, man, because you've covered a lot of ground. Let me just summarize it, so maybe ask some questions. First thing audience is gonna say is, I understand what you've said.

Is there a factual basis for all the statements you've made? And one of them is we wrote a book together on this, which detail this almost day by day from the very time you started with this.

up for the next year, year and a half or so in print and everything is documented. That's number one. Number two, you mentioned that the virus was

laboratory made. There's been all kinds of controversy about that. And the government has said, well, nobody knows where it from. They thought it was from the market, you'd address that. They

even shut the markets down, but it still occurred outside the market, just as you mentioned. And finally, they began to agree that, well, it may have come from the laboratory. And that's just

in the last months or so that they began to agree that, but that's been covered up also. So I'm coming to a question as why is all the cover up? And so from what you said, there's evidence that we

can use to support every statement in the papers you've written or in the book that we have, there's evidence that supports every comment

And so I think we get down to the first question is, what is this virus? It's a changed coronavirus. It's been changed in

the laboratory, but still what you're saying is the virulence. So the threat of this virus is still minuscule. It's very small, even the CDC, even when it published its data said that the death

rate from the virus alone, even this modified drivers, was basically could only account for less than a percent and even smaller than that of all the deaths. So it was from the cold morbidities,

but yet that was being used as a method of, of apparently inducing fear in the public. Is all of that what that I said is that summary correct because it's right accurate to the dot there's nothing.

So now we're through the virus. We've established the virus is man-made. And it basically is still a coronavirus. It's not virulent. And now we get into the next phase, which is the government's

going through all kinds of protective measures. You've got to wear masks, you have to social distance. You've got to stay home, you can't be treated. You go to the hospital, we've got to isolate

you. And you want to talk about the public and government reaction to what was now called a pandemic, but you just established it wasn't. Because people weren't dying from it. They were dying from

other comorbidities. And all this was being obviously amplified for the public. So what was about the protective measurements? What was the basis for that?

Well, if we look at it, and that was obvious as well For instance, if you looked at Sweden and Norway,

One country did all of these protective things, these so-called protective devices, PPP, to

protect the public, mask and washing their hands and social distancing, it's locked down all this nonsense. And then you see a country that shares a border, it did none of these things. The

mortality of COVID was no different. It did nothing And if you remember Faust, he said, All I need is, we need to lock down for two weeks, 'cause we just don't want the hospital to overrun. Well,

I, that rang a bell in my head because we had the H1N1

event before that. And I was interviewed and they asked me, he said, Well, do you think it's proper that they do some measures to keep it. from overwhelming the hospital. They were talking about

respirators, the whole business long before COVID. And I made this statement, don't worry about it, there's not gonna be any hospital to overrun, there won't be any need for the excess

respirators to solve nonsense. And I was the only one saying, I was on one of the networks wanted to interview me and after they heard that, they canceled it They talked to somebody that terrified

people that always gonna overwhelm everything. Well, what I'd done is looked at the south of the equator in the Southern Hemisphere, they had their winter before us and they had the flu season

before us. And if you looked at Australia, New Zealand, there wasn't any of these fearful things happening. Hospital were never run. There wasn't a need for excess respirators It passed, and it

was no different than any other place.

So it turned out I was right. The hospital went over run. There wasn't a need for the respirators. It was all nonsense. And so then when I saw this, I said, it's gonna happen again. They had

four motor company, general motors making respirators. First time in their life, they were just inundated millions and millions of dollars worth of respirators. The hospitals were gonna be

overworked and the news media was showing the hospitals, the workers were just exhausted from working. Then I found out, well, you know, there's a videotape we have hospitals that are empty.

They cordoned them off like a crime scene so people couldn't get in and see if the emergency room was empty. One, an intrepid person got in the hospital and got on the floors and it was empty And

now we found out that back then, two years ago.

Several of the hospitals had zero number of COVID patients. Other hospitals had numerous ones. What they were doing, putting them all in one patient and one hospital so they could have the media

come in, videotape them and say, look, we're overrun. Well, you and I did a residency. And when I was a resident, we were always overrun. We always had patients in the hall We always had

patients on stretchers in the hall. So that wasn't a note. That happened every year. So what we saw is there's a lot

of theatrics going on. And this lockdown was costing money. Businesses were shut down. Restaurants were shut down. They were closed permanently. Now we're having these economic discussions about

the cost of all this. These are something like half of the businesses Have it close their door. apparently. This has had a tremendous economic impact on people. School children were learning from

home on computers. Now, almost everybody involved in businesses was losing money except for a few. If you look at Silicon Valley, they made billions. You know what they made billions off of.

Well, you can't leave your house. You need to get on Amazon. You need to get on these special sites. And you need to teach and buy computers and teach your kids from a computer. So they made

billions. That was recently on Tucker Carlson program. He reviewed all of that. So not everybody was destroyed, but they destroyed the middle class, the smaller business, the restaurants, the

people who worked in restaurants. They lost their job. They have no job.

This went far beyond what they were telling people. And then we started looking at it. And like you said, the mortality rate was even less than the flu. And for the first time, it didn't affect

young people. And they were amazed. They said, well, we thought this was going to kill the little kids, babies, children. It didn't. In fact, they didn't transmit it, and they didn't catch

it It was more or less than 1 insulin. Let me stop you here for a minute, and then we can catch up. So what we've got is that you've talked about the effects. One thing I'm going to ask you,

because you wrote about this, you've written about every aspect of this, what was the effect of the mask, and what was the evidence behind it? There was no evidence. And in fact, the recent May,

we reviewed the evidence on the social distancing, the separator He said it was just pulled out of thin air, and what the experts were saying. This is an aerosolized virus. And so coughing and

sneezing is not the problem. It's aerosolized, which goes 27 feet. So if you were on a bus, you'd have to stand outside the bus, not just bread it. So the mass did no good. The other thing was

the size of the virus passed right through to math. And recently it's come evident. One of the things, I wrote one of the first articles about the math, when it's all stored. A friend of mine

that's asked me to write it. And I researched all of this, and I found out well the virus passed through the math, or the move forward. It's not coughing and sneezing that causes it. And most

people don't know how to wear a math. It leaks, it goes around the face, and they demonstrate that with smoke, and

different ways to show the mask as the aerosol go everywhere. It contaminates store shelves. It contaminates a person next to you behind you. So the mask was absolutely worthless. Well, they had

people who were experts in

bioengineering and they said, they had studied the mask for years and it's completely worthless.

And I look back at 17 studies that were done on

the flu virus and mask. And what these studies showed is that they even had people sleeping in a mask, wearing their mask at home, not just working out at home, but in the home, sleeping in them.

And it had no real effect.

You also wrote about the fact that if you have a mask and this can affect people with comorbidities,

it helps you, it makes you retain CO2 because you can't expire it. Right, you did. Did you tell us a little bit about that? Well, what I found is in the literature, people start retaining CO2

and have trouble oxygenated. And so they studied surgeons 'cause surgeons wear math while they're doing surgery. And they looked at all ages wearing a master in surgery and they measured their

oxygen intake. And they found that if it was over four hours, they were severely or significantly impaired Now, it was age-related, the older you are, particularly if you have comorbid disease

and you wear a mask, it's deleterious. If you're pregnant, it's deleterious. And when I looked at pregnancy, they have special mechanisms to prevent hypoxia 'cause it's so damaging to the baby.

Here you're wearing a mask producing hypoxia, damaging the development of the baby's brain And we know that that even extends two years after that. birth. The last trimester in the first two years

is when most brain development occurs.

So we knew all of it. And so people started measuring, well, what is the oxygen level in a math? They found it was extremely low. The other thing was they did a study in Florida when they looked

at contamination of the math. That is, it gets wet from your breathing and nasal secretion They found, I forgot something like 17 pathogenic bacteria. So these people were getting mask acne. They

were getting an abscesses of the face. And this, recently, someone looked at it and said, well, and I put this in my paper, they're re-breathing the virus. The virus goes through the olfactory

nerves into the brain. There's no blood-brain barrier between the olfactory nerves entrance to the brain. It goes to the. hippocampus, which is your memory and learning, and he goes to

frontalopes.

Now, that was well now. I was one of the first people to say it's going to get in the brain by the nasal passages, and I had a friend of mine that's ahead of a group in Arizona, and I told him

that. And about two or three weeks later, he said, Let's just come out. You were right. It's going through the nasal passages. And so, you know, I had studied the nasal passages and entered

into the brain for some other research I was looking at, and so I knew it. So the danger

is you're rebreathing the virus because of the math, and it's not only in your nasal cavity, now it's getting into your olfactory nerve and it's going into your brain and it's concentrated So let's

stop here for a minute. So what we've established so far, and there's absolute evidence to support every one of these statements. It's in the papers, which we'll show at the end, and we'll put in

the end of this program so people can copy them and look for them. We've shown that the virus itself, even the manufactured virus in its genetically altered form, is still

not very toxic.

It doesn't, it's not a serious infection, okay? And we have all the evidence to support that. Now we have the reactive measures of wearing a mask. You've just said that that's ineffective. The

social distancing didn't make any sense, but practically it

couldn't be implemented. So they made it, they chose a figure at six feet or five feet. These little circles they had on the floor where you understand, they were meaningless 'cause the virus

already got there and it spread talked already You've feet. 30 almost about that.

there was no protective measures that would be helpful. And so now we're down. We've gotten to the public home, they're isolated, they're away from work, businesses are closing. Now the vaccine

comes on the market. And they're publishing every day, they're publishing the statistics of the virus and they show,

did they have PCR testing at that time, early on before the vaccine? Oh yeah, well before that In fact they made a lot of PCR talk about it. So what they did is they had a test which would then

measure if you had the virus in your passages what people interpreted that or they were made to interpret that you were infected and ill. But the facts are, you correct me if I'm wrong, is that

these are people who just had evidence that it was there and we don't even know if that was at a dosage that was a severe enough. in a didn't say that it was a serious infection or disease. So the

data that was being put out was basically deceiving the public. Is that correct? That's correct. It goes further. I mean, of course, the developer of the PCR test, he made the statement, he

said, You never use PCR test to diagnose an infection He said, That's ludicrous. And he said, The PCR test can't tell the difference between a viral fragment, a live virus or dead virus. And he

said, So you're testing people, they may just have a fragment in it that's not infectious and it doesn't tell you they're sick or not. And so what they did is they tested virtually everybody in a

store, in a hospital. People were in car access, automobile bills, and suicide, all kinds of things. in the hospital, they tested it with PCR testing.

And then they was, oh, it's positive. And what they shown it, cross-react. It'll cross-react with any coronavirus. And across-react, they found out even when the flu virus. So it's not

specific. And it can't tell the difference between a live virus and did. Okay, so now we're setting the stage because out comes the vaccine So can you tell us a little bit about what is the vaccine,

what's in it, how does it work? You inject it and the companies told this. If you got it, it stayed in a certain location. You have to have two shots, not one. And then how long did it last?

And where was it distributed? Can you talk about those things? Yeah, a number of virologists. And as you said in the introduction, most of our virologers that were in foreign country. Some of

the world written noun by Robert, for instance, Dr. Bossey, who I've talked with,

and Dr. Carter, he's written a book, and I read his book and I'll watch his interviews. He was arrested for speaking out

And so, both of these people said

that

this is a ludicrous thing. He said if you would not treat it, not wear a mask, it's so benign and a short time, everybody would be immune to it, and this would all be over. So the natural

community was being ignored. It was absolutely, they had numerous physicians, had two physicians who started out talking about that. They were very popular, people listening to them, they threw

them out of their medical association and they took the relationship.

Okay, let's go to the vaccine. They make the vaccine up and the companies

are incentivized because they get paid by the government for making the vaccine. They gotta make millions and millions and millions of doses so everybody can be injected and also can go to foreign

countries. What is the, what's in the vaccine? I'd say it's a virus, what's the structure? What's in there? What are the components that are in there? Tell us a little bit about that. So we've

already got the virus What's about the vaccine? Well, it's not really a vaccine. And this is a point that people make. It's a genetic product. And what they wanted to do is try this new idea,

which was a messenger

RNA injection. And they designed the messenger RNA, but they knew that the body has an RNA ACE, which destroys it quickly And so they wanted encapsulated. and a nano lipid carrier. It's just like

a little box that puts it in, it puts it in a little bubble. That's made of lipids. And it stays inside there and it's protected against the enzyme. And

originally they said, Well, it stays exactly where we inject it. It won't go anywhere. The media, Paul Parroted that immediately over and over. It stays right in the arm And recently, the

developer and analytical care said, We knew from the beginning that was a lie. It goes everywhere.

They have

studied and they found out that the manufacturer of this vaccine, so-called vaccine had studied this before they released it, before it was approved under emergency organization, a bio-distribution

study This bio distribution studies show it went everywhere. It's particularly concentrated in the female ovary and everybody's bone marrow,

but it went everywhere, even in the brain. They found it everywhere. So they knew before it was ever approved from this bio distribution study they did, but that was a lot. And the media carried

that line. And when it was pointed out, they ignored it Let me ask you, did the companies do pathology studies? 'Cause I don't remember that they were commonly published on the animals that they

tested the vaccine. The cold vaccine that we're developing, the viral fragment or the

RNA vaccine. Tell me about

that. They don't publish any of this. In fact, they had gone to court. People were trying to get

a fola, a federal request for this information from the vaccine come. The companies went to the court, asked the court to give them a 25 year, it would be hidden. Then they changed it to 75 years.

They would be long gone by the time this information was released And of course, anybody has any sense would say, why did you want this information hidden even for 25 years? You had done these

studies, you didn't publish them, you didn't release the raw data, you refused to release the folder, and then you wanted hidden for 75 years. Now, at the same time, these people who are

theoretically dying, not theoretically who are dying, supposedly related to the virus. There are no autopsy studies. Why did that happen? I mean, in America, I think there's even, there's been

a decreasing percentage of autopsies, but I think there's still 6 to 10 something like that, but nothing was happening. What happened? Well, you know, generally we know everybody in medicine

knows your most accurate diagnosis. If you want to learn the most about a disease, it's the ultimate For the first time in the history of modern medicine, autopsies were discouraged. The CDC came

out to pathologists, don't do autopsies, here and in foreign countries. And so for the first time, they were not doing them. And the pathologists were literally screaming, we need more autopsies.

We need series of autopsies, large numbers They were asking for 80 up to 80 altups.

The government didn't want them to autopsy anybody.

The pathologist said, We've looked at the data, and, excuse me, well, they're afraid that the pathologists get infected from the dead, that died of COVID. They found there was only one

pathologist who even got sick from doing an autopsy, and he had it before he did the autopsy. So that

was shown to be false. That was a lie Well, then when they did the autopsy, they found out why. And what the autopsy does is, number one, is it tells whether the doctor made a mistake, whether

the doctor's treatment, whether the hospital's treatment, whether the nurse's treatment led to the patient's death, and had nothing to do with the bars. They didn't want that discovered

If you remember, they were paying extra to put COVID as the cause of death on destitute. first time ever, I'm

78 years old. I remember never being told what to put on a death certificate to build it out. Suddenly, hospitals were telling physicians, I don't care what they died from, put COVID on. We get

paid extra for

it. If you make it a COVID death. And they, one of the senators, I had to hear it He said 40 of the death certificates died of something else. Heart attack. One was actually shot and killed in

an assault. One committed suicide, a motorcycle accident. Own and own and own. And they wanted them signed out as a COVID death for several reasons. Once, immediately, they got more money but

it may be so-called pandemic look much worse. It instilled fear. Look at all these refrigerated trucks full of dead bodies. Look at these hospitals overrun with the

dead dying of

COVID and they knew that was a lie. That many of those people, particularly in nursing homes, these people were dying of other things. They didn't die of COVID. Okay, let me interrupt you here.

So we got to the virus or that we got to this and there's a little story about that I think not recently, but then the past, I think a year or a year and a half, it was revealed that the definition

of a vaccine was changed to accommodate this new RNA sequence that they were manufacturing, so that it could then pass under the restriction of being a vaccine. Can you explain that?

Well, it's not strictly a vaccine 'cause the vaccine is supposed to prevent a disease

and prevent transmission, it didn't either. So it meant none of the definitions of a vaccine. It did not prevent transmission, did not prevent disease. So you say, well, why are you calling

this a vaccine? And then you've got genetic structure in it. See, for years, they've wanted to make a DNA vaccine and the RNA vaccine, the DNA vaccine was just terrible value It just didn't work.

They're still trying to make it. And the RNA vaccine was only in

the research world to try to make a vaccine for cancer. It's never intended for a bar. The problem with the vaccine is it generates the spike protein. That's the purpose of the messenger RNA, is

it generates spike protein with a spike protein. is the toxic part of the virus. It's not the nucleocapsid, it's

the spike protein. That's the harmful part. And so you have an injection that is generating the most harmful part of the virus. And does it continuously? Well, there are so many things. When

they made this, they said we're gonna make an RNA, they're gonna manufacture in the laboratory and RNA virus, they put in there the spike protein and could have had the HIV or some other things

you'll tell me about that in a minute. That then does not stay in the arm. It's distributed throughout the body. It gets into the cellular tissues. You haven't gotten to this yet, but if it gets

into the cellular tissues, where does it go from there? And does it become part of the RNA and then the DNA of the individual? So you have an individual then for who can begin to generate. this

spike protein for their entire life. We haven't studied it that long, but at least as long as it's been studied, I think people have found that. So that's the vaccine. The vaccine has the RNA

sequence, which contains mostly the spike protein. And does it have some other things? Does it have an HIV sequence in it? It does, and there's other things being found in this vaccine that

they've consistently denied graphing oxide. They denied there was any graphing oxide in it. Well, a group of researchers at the universities, I think it was three universities in Spain,

universities from other countries all discovered yes, it contains graphing oxide. Well, graphing oxide, if not reduced, is extremely harmful if it oxidizes.

freely floating in your blood is a good chance it's gonna become oxidized and produce damage. So there's more in it than just a master RNA than a researcher who's a molecular biologist from the

university that I did my neurosurgery runs yet, the University of South Carolina. He found it contained thousands of bits of DNA, certainly DNA that is incorporated in the person's

DNA. Now, initially, even if we discount all that and just talk about the master RNA, a researcher said we found out that it reverse incorporates the master RNA into a DNA. They denied it, and

the news media carried it that there's no evidence of DNA insertion. Well, this was published, and it is in the medical literature that it does indeed undergo this reverse transcription into the

DNA. And that would mean not only is that person producing the spike protein from then on, he can transmit it to his offspring.

Oh gosh. So now we know now the vaccine. We know what the, this quote vaccine or this protein pseudo vaccine, maybe that's the

way to put it that way. What it does is produces a spike protein, it's got some DNA contamination, it has some other

metal products in the injection, also which could be harmful. None of these things are known. They didn't do testing in animals long enough to discover all this today

Well, they do hardly any animal testing. They just

did the bio distribution study. the rest of it they didn't do. And this is what people are making the point of, and they're right, is the human beings to people in the safety test and that are

being vaccinated now, or they're the test animal. Because none of the vaccines that are now being promoted today. And I says, now ahead of the history, what we're just talking about have been

tested in humans. The vaccine that is being promoted today for COVID, has not been tested in animals. That's been written, I think, in the news, but that is a fact, right? That's right. Now

things again, we've talked about, you've talked about, you've written in the papers, these are facts that can be determined. Okay, now we've got the, now we've got the

individual who's got the, quote the virus, which we know is not harmful. We know that people with co-morbidities don't do well.

We know they're being isolated, put on masks and so forth, businesses are being shut down, would have no effect on this. We know that the deaths that are being reported are being exaggerated,

we've just established that. We know that the testing does not test for the live virus or for illness, so we know that. Now what happens is there are two parts. One is the acute part, in other

words, some people were infected with the virus itself and became acutely ill. They went to the hospital. They weren't treated with anything because they said there was no drug they could treat you

with and they waited until the last minute to try something. Some people were put on steroids, on ventilators, but that's where the death rate occurred. So is there an acute reaction to the virus

itself? And then we're talking about the second set of reactions which are to the vaccine, which is producing the spike protein. is that correct? That's correct. Okay. Is the acute reaction that

people had some of these people went to the hospital and they immediately got worse and died? Was this because of their genetic predisposition to this? They didn't have a good immune system? What

were some of the explanations for that? Well, the people who became significantly ill,

they did have immune suppression and I

want to tell people this. The number one immune suppressor that the American public is taking in large doses, millions of people are statins. Statins are such powerful immune suppressing agents

that one of the transplant surgeons said, We always use it on transplant patients, you need them from rejecting Oregon And so. Here you have tens of millions of people on an immune suppressant,

particularly the older people. And now you give them a minor virus. And I told you that if you take just a common coal virus in a nursing home, the mortality is 8. That's significant. That

exceeds the COVID-19 virus So we know that it's related to immune function. If you have a good immune system, that's why young people don't get affected. They have good immune systems. And I think

they did have some pathology studies of those who cute deaths. And they found that there was an overwhelming immune reaction, just an excessive, and you've talked about this as say, an excessive

super immune response, which killed the patient, basically. Is that correct? Yeah, we generally call that a sitcom storm.

And what happens to these people is they came into the hospital, I put it in the paper and Corey talked about it. Is this is the first infection ever in my memory that we said, well, don't treat

the patient to their seriously ill, to their hospital life. That's never been done before. Just take Tylenol and drink some water. And then if you get really sick, go to the hospital. Well,

these patients, people did that. They went to the hospital and they weren't that bad off. They little short of breath. And they said it was unusual. We never seen this. Shortness of breath are

the oxygen level was low and they were talking. They said, they weren't in distress. They weren't panicked. He said, usually people who have very low oxygen levels

And so one of the, one of the young

medicine doctors, she was in one of the emergency rooms. He said, well, why don't we just give him half a little oxygen instead of a, put him on a respite. And well, we're afraid it'll spread

the COVID everywhere. Well, it was everywhere. 'Cause they showed that it's everywhere in the emergency room and in the interior. So he took a group of patients and he put him on just oxygen by

high flow, not by a respite. They did very well.

And these people will have a maccala toxic business. He said, you can see people with a blood gas appeal to us 40. And they're no distress. They're publicly comfortable. So he just raised it by

oxygen flow and they did fine. The ones on a respirators, The mortality was 80 or 90 percent.

The hospital was paid extra a lot of money per patient if you'd put them on a respirator. So they told all the doctors, you either put them on a respirator or we'll remove you. So they started

putting people on respirators and they had an enormous death rate and they blamed it on COVID. They weren't dying of COVID, they were dying of the imposed treatment Now, who imposed these standards?

The CDC Center for Disease Control. And as I said in my papers, they've never treated a single patient and they've never protocol. The experienced surgeons, experienced people out in the world,

treated thousands of patients, had almost no deaths. One untreated a thousand patients and he had one death and something like six hospitalizations.

They didn't ask him to make the protocol. They didn't ask the experts who were experts in pulmonary medicine to make the protocol. They asked people and the CDC had never treated a soul. And it

became absolute at every hospital. Right here in Mississippi, they had one of the doctors decided he wasn't gonna give the drug that they wanted to give. He wanted to give Ivermectin

They not only took away his hospital privileges, but they carried him out of the hospital with two hospital employees as if he was a criminal. He've had people who had their license removed. When

they insisted, I want to treat him different. Now Pierre Corey is an expert in pulmonary medicine. He's treated thousands of cases. And he said, what we find is there's intense inflammation And

if you treat them with steroids and don't put them in a respirator, they get well. Most of them, by far.

The

American College of Thoracic Surgeon came out, or Thoracic Medicine came out and said, Don't put anybody on steroids. And so hospitals wouldn't let anybody put patients on steroids. They were

giving patients by order

drugs that were supposed to suppress breathing. And then their oxygenation would falter, then they'd put them on a respirator, and then they'd die, and then they'd get paid more money. Now, as I

tell in the paper, what you find is that a large number of hospitals are going bankrupt.

And so they're desperate, desperate need for money. So they'll do these things And Uh, when I wrote this paper, I even heard from a hospital administrator who had quit and he said, that's just

what we saw, just what we experienced. Uh, this one all over the world, and they all said the same thing. 99 of this is exactly what we experienced. This is the end of part one. Of this

interview.

And this is part two of the interview with Dr. Blalock on what doctors need to know about COVID-19. Let's just for a moment, transition to the, you mentioned something and that is emergency use.

I want you to talk about what is this doctrine of emergency use How did that play into the pharmaceutical companies getting the free license to manufacture the drug? And that gets us to the second

thing is what about Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and steroids and other agents that essentially people were told not to take because Ivermectin is an animal drug or a big, so forth Can you talk

about those two things and we'll take a break? But first, what is the emergency use doctrine? Why is that important on this and how did this happen? What do this have to do with other drugs that

were supposed to be effective? And we know from their effectiveness

in other countries, but we're almost, we're essentially canceled out. Can you explain that emergency use in other drugs? Yeah, according to the law, emergency use authorization can only be given

if there's no alternative, in other words, not any other drug or treatment that will take care of the problem,

and if they were die of the one. Well, it didn't meet any of the criteria for emergency use authorization. They had several drugs that work like a medical miracle.

And so they've been over backwards to make sure this was not used.

Uh, whether the people that are in charge of all this, and that's the medical establishment. Okay. The medical, the hospitals and the medical associations and the government, bureaucracies to

CDC and, and so they banned it. And so the hospital were told, not only will you not use these things, like Ivermecta is that you'll lose your license, you'll be thrown out of the hospital if you

try to use it. So for the first time I ever remember is they banned. They told doctors, you can't write a prescription for Ivermecta.

It's a legal drug. It has been approved. It's extremely safe, extremely effective they will tell you can't use it and then private pharmacies were told, you can't fill it. So you can go to

Walmart or some of these other CVS and they'll refuse to fill it. So that's the first time I ever remember. So here's this a summary. We've got a virus that basically is no worse than really the

most COVID viruses, which are cold viruses.

We've got a reaction to this in which we have a test which then reports people as widely infected, which everybody is anyway, with a COVID virus. We have an exaggeration in the reports of deaths,

actually from comorbidities, not from the virus itself. And then what we have is the acceleration of an effort to make a vaccine, a quote vaccine, which doesn't even fit the definition of a

vaccine because it doesn't stop the disease, prevent the disease. and so forth, and then what we have is what you've then said is now there are other drugs or other agents on the market that were

used that had been affected. It was reported in Peru, Afghanistan, South Africa, and Bangladesh, where they couldn't afford a vaccine in those populations that used Ivermectin, and they had in

Africa because you take it from malaria, hydroxychloroquine, and these people didn't get the disease So there was evidence there, but that never appeared in the newspaper, so that was suppressed.

And so it all gets back to the one statement you just made. You couldn't, you could not support the use of quote this new vaccine.

If there was other treatments available on the market, this had to be the only alternative available So therefore, all the alternatives were basically debunked, were prevented from being. used in

every possible way you couldn't get it from the pharmacy, you'd be discharged, your career would be threatened so that everybody was forced then to use the vaccine. Is that correct? Yes, that's

correct. And like even Egypt, North India, Peru had enormous, and what they did is in those countries, they changed it from a prescription medication to over the count So in Peru, for instance,

they made sure everybody had access to Ivermectin. Now there's nonsense about horse medicine. They treat these parasitic diseases and horses and cows and stuff with Ivermectin, but it's determined

by the weight. So what happened is because the pharmacies refused to

fill it, people were going to the veterinary place right here in my own state My name was, they went. and bought the horse with the media called horseback, but it was pure hypermectin. And as I

told people, you don't own a million dollar horse and give a contaminated drug to it. And so it's determined by a white, well, somebody worked out the white. How much of this veterinary medicine

you use for a human? Well, the media was acting like you're taking the dose for a horse or a cow, which is four or 500 pounds, which is nonsense. And they knew it was nonsense. And if you look

at the

studies on it, it was completely safe. If you use the proper dose, not only did it stop the transmission, but it prevented you from getting ill. And so even severely ill patients treated

we're getting remarkably better. And the

FCC put together all the studies, it's something like 50-something studies that prove I were making works even for severely ill patients. So it prevents it, you from getting it, just take it once

a week. And it is used to treat it. But they were scared that if you do it, like Pierre Corey says in his book, we knew as soon as we discovered Ivermectin, this would end the pandemic. It was

over. It's simple, cheap, cost almost nothing, Ivermectin.

Ivermectin has also been found to be an entercancer agent.

It has been used for 40 years. There are billions of doses. It won the Nobel Prize because it was one of the safest medicines

So here they were producing phony research to prove it was dangerous. And so when the experts looked at the researchers and said, this is completely phony, you gave doses of Iremectin that were

huge, just so you could say it didn't work. Or you underdiagnosed, under medicated people. So they would have a patient in a hospital and you'd give them a tiny dose And then you would report in

your medical order, but it didn't work.

So they have all kinds of tricks to overcome it. So that gets to, before we take a break here, then it gets to the point where you got the person who's watching the show, he said, Well, gee,

where? So I went to the hospital and I had to have an injection in order to practice there. We had all the politicians were saying they got the injection. Why would these people be taking it if

they knew that it was gonna be harmful.

Well, then we discovered later on, some of these people were getting saline injections. They weren't getting the COVID infection. Other people were finding that, well, these vaccines either were

diluted or they were allowed to be about raising the temperature. If you raise the temperature, it's inactive. And they knew that. And so, and then they have hot lots and they found that some

lots of the vaccine are 200 times more often associated with fatality than other lots. They may be thousands of vaccines than a lot. And that's not unique to this vaccine. That happens in other

vaccines as well. And that came out of a series of British studies analyzing the lots of, I think it was Pfizer, showing the different strengths of the components. in that cold suit of vaccine

that they were getting injected. So some people, and I fell on a group, I had an initial two injections, where it turned out I traced the lot down and I was in a high risk category. It didn't

turn out that anything happened, but obviously there were different

strengths or toxicity of the lots. In fact, I think, again, it was reported, and I know you've written about this, that it was given to the military.

And they had a very high incidence of miscarriages, neurological deficits, but being in the military, it wasn't reported they got a lawyer who came out and defended them who essentially revealed

all this stuff, but that was also suppressed. You wanna come in and buy that? Yeah, it was Tom Rents. Tom Rents was an attorney. He's really been on top of this. And he looked at the data from

the military There was almost a thousand percent increase in neurological problems. with the vaccine. There was a massive increase to a 300 increase in cancer.

And autoimmune diseases is just skyrocket. So he found all these things among the military and they covered it up. I was contacted by members of the military and they asked what to do. And I said,

well, you know, I was in the military and I said, there's a uniform code of military justice which says you don't have to follow any order that is illegal. I don't care if a general said, and I

said, just tell them, according to the uniform code of military justice, this is an experimental vaccine, I do not have to take it. And they can't force you to take it and they can't throw you

out of the military.

Okay, let's move on to

the next set of

questions. Do you want to take a break for a minute or are you okay? I'm fine.

The next set of questions are let's see what the effect of the vaccine is in terms of diseases. And maybe we could go organ system by organ system are the most common ones. Do you want to discuss?

Okay, so we've talked about the vaccine and we talked about it has got the spike protein in it. We talked about it. It could have some immunologic fragments which suppress your immune system.

We've talked about it could have some DNA fragments and we talked about it may have a substance that's a metal, that's a toxin. Now it was injected in the arm. It distributes in the arm and it goes

to a whole bunch of systems. Which are the most sensitive ones? And where does it go? What do we know about it? Start with the first one. Is the heart the first one or the blood vessels the first

one or the brain? Well, it seems to be the endothelium of the blood vessels and the endothelium has a numerous spike, H2 receptor.

So this spike protein in the vaccine attaches very easily to the endothelium and enters it and damages it. And Dr. Burkhardt, who was originally died, he's a pathologist, very eminent pathologist

from Germany. And he looked at this in all types. And he found that throughout these blood vessels, these in the microbuzzles, the

endothelium was

infected with spike proteins, the S1, S2,

and including the heart. Next was the heart. And then when you look at it, it was a bone marrow. Well, they recently reported what there's an increase in leukemia in the bone. And these children,

I predicted that I said, because it enters the bone marrow, we're gonna see a spike in leukemia. and children. And we're gonna see adults start coming down with multiple myeloma and other diseases

associated with the bone marrow. Okay, you said that now. What about the blood vessels? Because there were studies that came out and it came out from the morticians in England who were autopsying

the bodies because they had all of a sudden not an increased number of deaths. And I think it was three or four times the number they were seeing. And when they wanted to inject the formaldehyde of

the fixative in the vessel, they found that they couldn't do it because the vessels were filled and they took out these long clots that they said they've never seen before in their lives. Is that

from the vaccine and what it was inducing in terms of the blood vessel damage? Well, it was only in the vaccinated. And I watched several of those videos said where they interviewed the mortician

from England. And he was distraught. He said, I've never seen so many deaths. And he said, Just like you said, you can't inject the embalming clotsuntil you remove the clot. And he said, These

clots are fibrous clots. They're not like you see post-modal clotsthat are very soft and easy to dissolveand you can inject the embalming fluid through them. He said, These are rubbery, very hard

clots, and they don't dissolve. He said, You can use what's used in medicineto dissolve clots and they won't dissolve.

And so he found people with clots as long as two or three feet

and they're arteries in their legs or arteries in their pulmonary system. And so, yes, and we're seeing a clots in the brain, seeing the carotid artery thrown on both She was a sagittal scientist

around both of us. uh, and we've never seen that before, and I was interviewed and, and, and the woman said, how many sages of sinus thrombosis have you ever seen? I said, well, in all of my

practice, I may have seen two or three, very long. It's extremely rare. And, uh, I've seen transverse sinus thrombosis, but it's extremely rare. And now they've had numerous cases, all in

vaccinated people. And so now we know that with the inflammation of that endothenium, it triggers the immune system to activate and it produces an amyloid substance that is causing the fibrous type

clot. It's not a normal clot. Is this responsible for the acute death of a, that's increased in young, young, healthy, and very active athletic people? Or is it, or is it the

myocarditis that, that's also, you haven't talked about that yet. that you've got from the vaccine? It's both, but most of these athletes are dying of a mild carditis, and what they dive in is

an arrhythmia.

And they're very sensitive to epinephrine. If they get excited or exercise, they release epinephrine and it triggers the arrhythmia. And I've tried to tell them, that's because the electrical

system of the heart is replete with glutamate receptors And you're activating those. And if we look at these micro vessels in the heart, they're thrombose, they're inflamed, they inflamed the

heart, and they make the muscle irritable. So we have two ways of getting to the heart. One, you can include the blood vessels, which that's been shown. Two, you can get myocarditis. There was

a recent report that came out that said the CDC knew about the myocarditis. In fact, they collected data, but they didn't want to report on it because they thought it would panic the public. so

they didn't want to tell them about the myocarditis. But it's been reported in countries around the world, cardiologists have seen this. And so that's one of the things. So that's for the heart.

And the lungs was there a hyperimmune reaction that was causing the lungs to have consolidation and so forth because remember in China they would hold up the x-rays of the consolidated lungs. What

was the cause of that? Well, it can do that. And what I reported in your journal - no, I reported in another journal - was the cytokine storm in the lung is due to excitlet toxicity. And I

reference it with the numerous references showing that these cells, avial cells inside the lung, secrete glutamate They make the lung

leak, and so the fluid will leak. out of the vessel, into the lung, producing the consolidation. And so he had and the inflammation. And so you're seeing destruction from that process. You take

a few minutes out and tell the audience, 'cause you've been a pioneer in this area. You've talked about it for years before it became, it's becoming more accepted. What is immuno-excitotoxicity?

How is it primed? And what does it mean?

Well, I was friends with the man that discovered excitotoxicity, Dr. Olney. And I went to his lab and stayed at his house.

Excitotoxicity primarily is due to secretion of the excitotoxin glutamate. And it triggers free radical generation. It interacts with nitric

oxide and it produces severe destruction. Usually in the brain, so all of the gerinity brain diseases that we commonly talk about are excited toxic diseases. They're finding it in neuropsychiatric

disease. They're finding it in a numerous diseases. Well, what's not known is that among most physicians, it is known among researchers, is that there's glutamate receptors throughout your body,

your heart, your lungs, your pancreas, intestines, muscle, everything has glutamate receptors, just like in the brain. Except the brain is protected against glutamate somewhat by

the blood-brain barrier. And you don't have that protection in your retina and you don't have it in your organs. And so it's easy to trigger that. Now what happens is there's a connection between

Immunological Activation and Activation of this. of toxicity. And what we find is that if you get stimulated anywhere with an injury or an immune stimulation, it instantly activates excited

toxicity. And I explain that in a couple of articles in your journal in which I show the mechanism by which it does it and quote the literature that proves it. So now we know that most of these

diseases aren't pure excited toxic diseases that immuno excited toxic disease. So what you're getting to is a concept that I wanted to bring out. And that is that we're getting into the 21st century

and recognizing that there are diseases that are like autoimmune diseases, but and they are a component of the immune system. But essentially, if if you irritate or prime the immune system enough,

it will overreact. and when it overreacts, it'll attack, it'll attack the other cells in the body and the brain. We're gonna come to that in a minute and then cause a lot of degenerative diseases

and other diseases. And it's highly active in COVID and particularly with the pseudo vaccine because you keep turning out despite protein to which the body is continuously reacting and forming more

sensitivity and more immune reactivity. Is that correct? Yes, it's like being vaccinated all the time. It's like 24 hours a day you're being vaccinated. And that's because in all your blood

vessels, your micro vessels, all your tissues, this inflammatory process going on, which is immuno-excited toxic. So it produces immuno-excited toxicity in your heart, in your lungs and your

muscles and your tissues. We, I'm gonna write about this one day

all autoimmune diseases are really immunoexcited toxic diseases, and so some of the

immunologists have looked at MS, for instance, and they said the amount of damage we see cannot be explained by the immunology alone. It's probably excited toxic. So, in fact, it turns out now

another branch is a medicine and a nervous system, which you know, we're talking about in brain tumors.

The brain tumor is living in an environment in which part of the environment wants to attack the tumor because it's not normal. Another wants to protect it from being attacked.

And so nature has some kind of a balance in the immune system here. But once you keep getting this spike protein being thrown out, you've upset the balance and the whole system can go awry and allow

these other kinds of diseases and illnesses to occur, which then gets to the it gets to the heart damage and into the central nervous system damage. I'll lead into this. I had a patient that I know

have had her vaccination with the pseudo vaccine. And she got a immediate loss of smell. And then came back and had another injection. And then got a little loss of memory, which lasted a short

time. Then

had

another set of immune, another set of vaccinations. And she got a neurological deficit. And so what was happening in that young woman was that she was being continuously threatened and assaulted

with attackers to her immune system, which then was overreacting So tell us a little bit about what the, what the vaccine. And now it's components that are now part of every cell and everybody's

churning them out. And I didn't ask you this question. If this is gonna happen, Russell, what do we know? Is this gonna happen for the rest of my life? Or is it gonna happen for a few months and

it goes away? Or don't we know? Well, we don't really know 'cause they've never studied it. And so we don't know what's gonna happen to all these people. One of the results that's come out

recently is they've concluded that it costs 24 years of people's life. And a cardiologist said 75 of these people who have mild carditis will be dead in 10 years.

Recently it came out that 1, 400 young athletes have dropped dead who were vaccinated.

So you don't really know and they all talk about this We don't know what's gonna happen in tenure. We don't know what's going to happen in six years, five years.

And because they didn't do any studies. This is all unexplored ground. And we're going to find out. But I don't think it's going to be proved. So the studies are really now being ongoing,

actually, in human beings. That's what's happened. So in the nervous system, there are some people

who get this woman who had all these things. This could have been an immuno-excitotoxic reaction with an overreaction. And if it gets to be continued and repeated, and you've written about this,

does this result in Alzheimer's disease, or Parkinson's disease, or other kinds of diseases like autism and so much to see in a tremendous increase? And do you want to take a little side trip here

and answer that question? Yeah, I in fact, I predicted it I said, You're gonna find these - people have been fully vaccinated for getting these boosters. I say, we're gonna see neurologic

diseases skyrocket. We're gonna see autism skyrocket. And we're gonna see neurological diseases we've never seen before. All those predictions are already coming through. For instance, prion

diseases They

were extremely rare, called a mad cow disease, spongiform encephalopathy. They were very rare and they took years to develop. We're now seeing people, there were 26 cases of prion disease and

vaccinating people reported. And they said, it was so unusual about it within a week, two weeks to a month at the most. They developed a prion disease and they died within a week

What's a hope for the audience? A prior disease is

is it's a accumulation of a foreign protein or malfunctioning protein in the cells of the nervous system, right? Yeah, a pryon is normal. It's a normal protein and it's protected. What I've just

discovered, pryons

protect your brain from excitotoxicity. And so what

they did is they blocked pryons to see what it would do and it caused excitotoxicity. It's a break on it. It's a way to comment. And so the spondyliform encephalopsies due to pryon disease may be

the fact what happens is protein is misfolded 'cause proteins form a conformation, three-dimensional folding. If they're not folded exactly right, they don't work right. And so what we see is this

normal pryon is misfolded in this disease. And that spreads. So the other prions, they become exposure.

And so that's the basic problem. Is it may be releasing excitatory toxicity everywhere.

But fortunately, we have a couple of natural ways to possibly reverse it. Well, you're leading into what the audience wants to know. So that we've gone through the whole thing and we've gone

through what the original virus was. It's not very lethal at all In fact, it's no worse than most regular COVID

CO viruses. We've gone through the fact that they went through all kinds of measures to basically alarm the public. We've gone through the fact that you couldn't have had thesua vaccines come out

unless you had the emergency use doctrine, which means that you couldn't have any other competing agents. And we've invalidated those, the use of those so everybody had to have it. We got to the

isolation, masking procedures, so social distancing, which we've talked about have absolutely no value. Then we've gone to this CO2 vaccine, which does not localize in the muscle, as we said.

It spreads throughout the body. It can have an immediate

allergic, quote, allergic reactions, which why some of these people responded to steroids when they were acutely ill. But it can have more long-term chronic effects, which you're talking about

basically the mechanism is the immunoexidotoxicity, which

can be produced in other organs. And it also goes to the reproductive organs, which makes them sterile. We didn't go into that in detail. It goes to the heart and making clots and also causing

myocarditis. You talked about the long-term effects. You've talked about, we don't know what the long-term effects are 'cause nobody studied it. And usually when they studied a vaccine, I thought

they had to study it for. some years before it was released for the public. Am I correct about that? Well, the Jackarite, in fact, if it's a new type of vaccine. Is there some? Yeah, it's 10

years to be studied before it's released. Oh, okay, so now we got that one. And we're gonna come to the obvious question at the end, but so now the question the audience is gonna have is, okay,

I see this. And you've explained why some people are not getting yellow and other people are getting yellow and on some, maybe some people aren't getting there. The real serious quotes to the

vaccine. What can I do? Because I'm going to the doctor, and I'm gonna come to that, the last part of this. I'm going to the doctor and he's, maybe I went to a doctor recently. And he said,

well, I've stopped telling my patients to take the vaccine. I'm leaving it up to them. How about that one? That's nice. That's new. So, obviously, are reacting to the fact that there have been

reports that it's not so good, but they don't want to take full responsibility for it, so they give it to the patient. And that's why the patient goes to the doctor in the first place. What do I

know about this? So anyway, the question then is, you said there are some things you can do maybe to offset it. What do you suggest? And we're not here to prescribe medicine to people, but this

is what you study. You study the effect of a whole bunch of these agents, and you study essentially the biochemistry of health and disease. What would seem to be something that would effectively

work?

Well, the most effective thing is neutralize or get rid of the spike protein. And there's a number of proteolytic enzymes like natoconides and bromole, which does that. And

The FCC recommends it, but I'd recommend it before they did, is that we see if people take this every day, they wipe out the spike protein, then they don't have to worry about it anymore. And the

energy is that lowers your fibrinogen, which increases your clotting, and it dissolves clots, and so you get better blood flow. And also lowers blood pressure

The Japanese would eat a lot of cereal that contain nattoconase, and they have an extremely low heart attack rate. And the researchers have looked at it and said, That's probably why. And so they

began to look at nattoconase, and he said, There's probably a good replacementfor aspirin to prevent strokes from heart attack So it's safe and there's good research on it.

And there's almost no side effects. If you have an ulcer, you have to be careful with it. But otherwise, it didn't get rid of this spike protein. And that was the gold. As people want to know,

how do you get rid of the spike protein?

The other thing is nano-curcumin, nano-curcumin, which is just a very small molecule of curcumin. It's not different, except for the size And it enters, it's been shown to block COVID.

It's also a very powerful anti-inflammatory antioxidant. So the two together would give you tremendous protection. It also has been shown to be one of the few things that stops the progression of

prion diseases. So apparently, what's happened with the prions is either the inflammation plus

the free radical generation produces misfolding. curcumin blocks.

Curcumin in your brain,

you see high levels in beta amyloid. So it keeps the beta amyloid from causing any problem. So people are going to be sitting down saying, well, wait a minute. And I'll give you a story from

yesterday. And they're going to say, well, it was a nano kinase with his bromiline and it was nano curcumin, right? Those are the three they're going to say, well, how come I'm not reading

about this number one? Number two, I had to go to the hematologist the other day, as we were following up in

an anemia. And I said, well, you know, I've been taking eliquis because I had some problems in the past with thrombosis. But I said, you know, what about nano kinase? I'm asking a hematologist

and it's an anti-clotting agent.

He said to me, Well, I don't never heard about it, and I don't know anything about it, so you should take this. And my guess is the reaction in these people are going to write it down. I'm sure

they'll look at the video and so forth. And they'll go to the doctor, they ask them a question. It's going to be the same answer. And the question then is, Why don't we hear about it? Why don't

we know about this? There are people, you're not the only one who has talked about it. There have been some others. You were one of the first. Why don't we know about this? Well, it's in the

medical literature and there's a lot of things in the medical literature people don't know about. And I have people all times say, Well, it sounds good all that you do. I'm going to ask my doctor

about it. He doesn't know a thing about it. And so I say, Well, you might as well ask your man about it. He probably knows just as much as your doctor knows about it. Because when we go through

med school, they teach us pharmacology. We have pharmacology representatives. We learn about chemists. We don't learn about these things. And so in the medical literature, there's people who are

world experts in this area, and they've written beautiful

articles. And in the articles they write, do you have any conflicts of interest? They're not working for these companies. They don't sell this They don't make money from it. They just studied it.

And I've sent you a bunch of articles on that, to Akanais, and these are extensive reviews that looked at all the

literature. And the hematologists that are doing the research made that question. Why aren't we using this instead of aspirin? Why aren't we using this instead of these other agents that have all

these dangerous side effects?

and the bromblain or the ivermectin or the

hydroxylchloroquine. So, so we were leading into the last last subject. We covered a lot of territory, it's taken us about an hour and a half, but it's okay. And obviously, if I'm now sitting

in the couch. I got the message that the virus isn't wasn't lethal, we'll begin with I got the message that

that was spread around the world, so everybody had it. We got a testing system that showed that you have it, but it had no indication that it was related to any disease, or that it had any

relation to any, any batch true virus you had, you could have had a fragment in there And

so we had people with comorbidities, and there's a whole host of evidence that said that these people don't do well. You started with your citation of what happened in Italy. And I think that was

well understood. And then we get to the vaccine, which isn't exactly a vaccine. And it was, the definition was changed so it could be kind of fit into there because it doesn't stop the disease

from occurring or it doesn't prevent the disease from occurring and it's transmitted. So it doesn't qualify as a vaccine, but yet it was promoted and it's a new chemical agent. And if it's a new

chemical agent, it didn't fall into the criteria of being investigated 10 years before it's released into the public. And then we find out that when they inject it and it's got not only the spike

protein, it's got some DNA contamination or may have some toxic metal in it and so forth. It doesn't stay on the muscle that goes throughout the body. You could have an immediate reaction to it

because you're immunologic predisposition and you get the

overreaction of your immune system but then it gets into the blood vessels. It gets into the heart. It gets into the central nervous system. It gets into the organ systems. You talked about the

blood marrow. And we got a whole series of complications there, many of which are united by the hypothesis that you've made, which has been subsequently proven that immuno-excitotoxicity is going

to be a disease of the 21st century in which essentially the body is so primed and so attacked by multiple infections and invasions that it overreaction essentially causes damage by itself and could

lead to autism, Parkinson's, old-timers and a whole variety of other things. And so now we're at the point of, well, what we can do about it and we got some agents out there that are just like

Ivermectin hypoxochloric when nobody knows about it. They're not reported in the press. the journals aren't publishing them and you have to go to the early articles who sent me aren't in common

journals. And so

they're going to go to a doctor, they're going to hear what I said, I don't know anything about it, but you decide it doesn't help them at all. And so we're getting down to the final question,

which everybody is saying, and that is, what the heck is behind all this? I mean, you got the government that's covering up evidence, you got the FDA, you didn't mention it, but they're

involved. We got the CDC, it doesn't really know what to say, and that's telling you about all the social distancing, masks, masking, shutdown of businesses, and then they change, and then

they change back again. We got the government, which isn't reporting the complications to get of the of this quote-su vaccine, and we get a revelation in the past few weeks that the CDC didn't want

to tell everybody because they were going to alarm everybody.

And so I'm sitting out there, I'm a member of the public and I'm a physician watching this. I don't know this, the hospital didn't tell me and I saw some people, I know of a case of a man who was

marched out of UCLA hospital as an anesthesiologist 'cause he said, I think you should give our vermectin. And you know, and you have a number of people you know around the country whose license

were taken away. Mero Ness and Maine was a physician who advocated using it. They took a license and now they're sending or so, a psychologist, it's like a Russian Gulag.

This is unheard of. So the question is, what's behind all this? And can you spend a few minutes? And that's not enough time in me, where I left them in another session. What's behind this and

why? It was all covered up. It was covered up from the very beginning, as you said in China. What's behind all this?

Well, number one, there's a lot of money Boop. They farm pseudo companies off of this pseudo vaccine have made a trillion dollars or more.

Countries have purchased this so-called vaccine for billions of dollars, but we paid over 40 billion dollars for those. So these companies have gotten their money before the first vaccine was given

That's number one, it's made them enormously rich. They're enormously rich. They're also, it increased the power of the central government. Now they have power they never had before. They can

tell you to take something that could kill you. They can take something that would possibly destroy you, destroy your children They can tail pregnant women, you'll never have a baby.

your baby, if you have, it's gonna be deformed.

So they have enormous power. They've collapsed the capitalist system, the free enterprise system. So now they can say, well, it didn't work. We need a socialist system. So we can plan things.

It's all about planning, interventionalism. And as one of the great thinkers said, it's not planning versus chaos. It's your plan versus my plan. I wanna be healthy. I wanna live long. I wanna

do things. I wanna work. Your plan says, you work for me. You do what I say. If I decide that you're not worth it, I wanna get rid of you. And so we're at a point where now's the elite of

society the elite of society has decided. We're gonna have this ultimate plan we've always wanted, but now we have the technological know-how to do it. And we can do it. And you will take this,

or you'll be eliminated. They have a new UN treaty that's gonna be signed by a lot of countries. And one of the things it says is, now we've invented a new word called mile information. It means

your information may be true In other words, everything I said is true. But if it makes loose faith in your government, that's mile information and you will be punished. We're seeing a level of

censorship. I don't ever remember seeing. We're seeing articles and journals canceled. I've never seen that to that degree. You're seeing world-renowned experts demonize, lose their license,

thrown out of medical suspects.

It's things I've never seen in my entire

60 years in. I mean, it's just amazing. And it's getting worse. It's getting more controlling. And the individual no longer matters anymore. It's the group. They decide what you will do. And

this new thing says that the UN and the WHO, WHO can declare anything an emergency Not just a pandemic, but global warming. It's the new emergency. Now you will drive an electric car. You will

have a smart meter put on your house. You will do this and that. And if you don't, we have a social credit system that will take away your income. And all of these things you're mentioning exist.

in various authoritarian governments throughout the world in China, everything you've said exists in Russia to exist to, I think, a fair degree, and it sort exists. So I think you've answered an

excellent summary of what's behind it. It's a power in money, a competition for power and money, and the poor individual does not get the truth, and obviously affects the media because they

control the media, and there were some evidence that came out through the Twitter papers. I think everybody knew in the last but Twitter that he revealed all the emails that were occurred during the

COVID pandemic, which isn't really a pandemic, and it just spread worldwide like a cold, and it found out that in collusion with government agencies, FBI. I

think I'm right about this. The CDC.

And they were able to suppress certain kinds of information because they characterized that this is all in the Twitter papers, it's not from me telling you, it's all published information in the

Twitter papers, look up the Twitter papers, it's in there. That this is Russian propaganda and therefore they would dismiss it. And it's all been revealed. And the media was paid off by a

government grants, that's also available factual information to essentially suppress this information. So,

and those are some of those things are in into your articles. So I think we've come full circle from the beginning of where we start with this to the end and we get down to the public and what we're

interested in as I said at the beginning is we're interested in putting facts out, we're interested in the truth. All that everything you said is factual, It can all be documented by the papers

you've written about it by other papers. We'll have some references on the site. People can look at it. I'm sure there'll be people who are gonna criticize this, but our goal as physicians is to

report what we believe is the truth. And if you have reasonable objections to it, we're happy to listen to it. We're happy to consider them. I think I sent you yesterday a paper that I'd gotten

from India. I don't know if you had a chance to look at it. Right, some people from India, because they use the, they use the Iremectin error. And he went through, they went through, there

were several authors and they were infectious disease. And they went through a series of all the papers after I said, initially, you didn't study this enough. And they said, Iremectin works, I'm

going to talk to Clark and all of these things work. There's evidence for it. However, the World Health Organization, studied 10, 000 patients and it wasn't a value. Therefore, we're not gonna

believe this information that we just read.

It's ludicrous. So they investigated, they found out the fact, the facts were justified, but they didn't believe the other information and then other information, there's a book by Robert F.

Kennedy called Fauci, Robert F. Kennedy Jr, where he goes into extensive detail about all the things we've discussed today in every form And in which he talks about all of the things that you've

mentioned. So it's not just Russell Blalock talking about this. There are other people who've written it,

who've been terrorized, who've been suppressed and so forth because they want to get the truth out, that's what we want to do. Anything that we didn't cover you want to cover?

Well, you know, as you always say, connect to dots. And I tell people, well, if you see something happen, give me another explanation for it. You have Ralph Berwick giving a communist,

Chinese laboratory the golden fleas. They didn't know how to make this virus attack human lung after healing. He showed them how. He helped them build the virus. And then you look at, well, how

did you spread? Well, everywhere in Asia, everywhere else that had it. They said, the first thing we saw was an influx of Chinese.

And I had a friend of mine in Maryland. And he said, just before the COVID outbreak, this is before this injection nonsense, he said Chinese showed up in town. And then right after that, COVID

started happening. And I showed you a videotape in which they were putting nasal secretion on doorknobs and benches and coughing on vegetables and stores to try to spread it.

So I think it, it, it, you can call people conspiracy theorists. But if you got an explanation presented,

and that's about to help it

The other thing I didn't mention early on is Russell and I wrote a book together called the China virus. What is the truth? This was early on in the, in 2020, 2021 was published, which goes into

all the early evidence about this at the time. I read about it. I was very confused because I kept getting different pieces of information and then decided to sit down and chronologically put it

together. It's available free on

the SI website. but we'll have that in the references also. So there's lots of information out there. If you want to look into it and get it, you can find it. There's a website, F-L-C-C-C,

which is a group of people who've gotten together who believe similarly to what Russell said. It's a website that gives you factual information on this. We'll put that up on the website also.

Russell, I can't thank you enough for, your knowledge has been just tremendous and you've done a super job of explaining this. If the,

these are selective references which Dr. Blalock has written on COVID and immuno-excitotoxicity.

You can take a screenshot and copy this and use these as a reference list to search for these papers. They're available in surgical neurology, international free Other people have written -

extensive articles on COVID-19, the vaccine, and its complications.

Naveen Athropuli has written on

a report of myocarditis spiked

in the first year of COVID-19 vaccination study. It's in the epic times.

Zachary Steiber has written an article in the CDC, which labeled accurate articles as misinformation, which documents show, and as he states in his title, this is not government working for the

people that is government as an adversary to the people. It's also published in the epic times. Mentioned in the discussion is the group called FLCCC. It's an alliance of over 16, 000 physicians

around the world

who have done research and written papers and treated patients

with other forms of treatment than vaccine.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has written an extensive book detailed research

on vaccines, on the companies involved, on the people involved. And this book is on amazoncom. It's entitledThe Wuhan Cover Up And

lastly, The Epic Times, which is an internet newspaper

worldwide, has published a series of detailed television interviews and articles covering the subject of COVID-19, vaccines, complications

that have occurred. It's an excellent source of detailed reference material. We hope you enjoyed this presentation. The material provided in this program is for informational purposes and is not

intended for use as diagnosis or treatment of a health problem or as a substitute for consulting a licensed medical

Please fill out your evaluation of this video to help us improve our programming and also obtain CME credit.

The recorded session is available free on snidigitalorg.

If you have questions or comments or you want to send your CME application, send it to osmunsnidigitalorg.

This program is supported by the James I. and Carolyn R. Osman Educational Foundation owner of SI and SI Digital, and the Waymaster Corporation produces of the leading gen television series,

Silent Majority Speaks and Role Models, and the Medical News Network

Thank you

What every doctor should know about Covid-19; Russell Blaylock, MD; Total 2 hour Interview

Rate This Video

James I. Ausman, MD, MA, PhD

Russell Blaylock, MD

Panelists

SNI Digital®, the Global, Interactive, Peer-reviewed, Video Journal of Neurosurgery and Neuroscience-2024 Edition; "Innovations in Learning" for the 21st century

SEE NEW VIDEO BELOW ON LATEST SNI DIGITAL® UPDATE BELOW

New Program Additions with Discussion: Click underlined Title to see video

New Upgrades Added:

NEW SNI Digital® Version 3.2.2: more than 30 New Features- All working.